Tuesday, 11th May 2021
Logo Islandinfo
Mauritius in your hands            

Find in Mauritius

Sight Seeing
Eating Out
Body & Soul
Real Estate
Mauritius Map
Mauritius Online Magazine May 2017 Issue
Expatriates in Mauritius
Mauritius Discovery
Mauritius Explore
Mauritius Escape

Forthcoming Events
in Mauritius

Events & Galleries
in Mauritius
Min: 19 Max: 27
Partly Cloudy
Other regions of Mauritius
08 Aug 2013

The stories suggested players from both England and Australia could be investigated but only named Pietersen.

"To suggest I cheat by covering my bat with silicone [in order to fool the Hot Spot system] infuriates me. Such horrible lies."
Pietersen added:  "How stupid would I be to try to hide a nick when it could save me on an lbw appeal, like in [the] first innings where Hot Spot showed I nicked it."
The reports originated from Channel Nine in Australia,  which said: "It is understood that silicone tape is applied to the edge of the bat, and concerns centre around Kevin Pietersen's dismissal in the second innings in Manchester.
"It is not just England under investigation. Nine News understands that Australian batsmen may also be using this method."
The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) wants an apology and explanation from the broadcaster.
International Cricket Council general manager Geoff Allardice is to meet England and Australia players in Durham in the build-up to the fourth Test match, which starts on Friday, to address wider concerns over the use of the Decision Review System.
The subject of silicone tape - which is not currently banned - may be raised in the discussions. However the governing body stressed it was not investigating Channel Nine's claims.
Australia captain Michael Clarke insisted none of his squad were cheats.
"I didn't know there was such a thing you could do to hide nicking the ball on Hot Spot," he said.
"I wouldn't think it would make any difference. I've never heard of anyone doing it."
England seamer Graham Onions, who could return to the team at his home ground of Chester-le-Street this week, said of the allegations: "The first I had heard about it was when I walked in the changing room this morning.

"It seems completely blown out of proportion. I know England players would not put things on their bats.
"It sounds completely silly to even think people are putting things on their bats to try and aid or cover up decisions.
"It is a huge accusation. It is outrageous really. The excitement of me getting called up and seeing the lads again, to have these discussions it seems a little unfair and a little wrong really. I think maybe we can move on and talk about this Test match."
Warren Brennan, Hot Spot's inventor, said he and his company, BBG Sports, have agreed with the ICC they will not comment until after an investigation from the game's governing body.
Hot Spot works by detecting friction caused whenever the ball hits a bat or pad. The energy transfer produces heat, which is revealed by infra-red cameras.
The system has recently been criticised after failing to pick up edges during the Ashes series and England wicketkeeper Matt Prior told the Daily Telegraph:  "I am not sure we trust Hot Spot any more. There are so many edges it has missed."
Pietersen was caught behind for eight in the second innings of the third Test at Old Trafford.
He reviewed the decision but although the Hot Spot technology showed no evidence of a mark on the bat, the verdict was upheld by television umpire Kumar Dharmasena, who heard a noise while watching a TV replay, suggesting contact had been made.
Snickometer technology - which measures sound and displays it graphically - is not permitted as part of the official DRS, but appeared to vindicate Dharmasena's call.


source: www.bbc.co.uk

« Back
Publish your article with us for free
Home | About us | Contact Us | Advertising | Link to Us | Airport   Bookmark and Share Site by: Islandinfo & Maxuz Web Agency